Friday, September 09, 2005
I posted the following in late August. I'm reposting it in response to The Bulldog Manifestos (link in the title) call on bloggers of like mind to call for Bush impeachment with a unified voice. The case layed out for impeachment below has to do with this administrations lying us into the Iraq quagmire. I believe the incompetence demonstrated with the Hurricane Katrina response is criminal and also a solid reason for impeachment. If requested I will post a treatise on that in a future post. In the meantime... here is Lying: The case for impeachment.
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
These are the famous 16 words from George Bush given in his state of the union address on Jan. 28, 2003.
Impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton began on November 05, 1998. The basis for this impeachment was President Clintons statement under oath that he had not had "sexual relations" with Monica Lewinsky.
Lets compare the nature of these two lies shall we? President Clintons perjury had to do with an extra marital affair. The nature of this activity is such that participants in the affair attempt to cover up and conceal said affair. This is not to justify perjury. It is to attempt to understand that it is part of the human condition to lie about this type of activity. The Republican controlled house of Representatives thought the transgression was serious enough to warrant the impeachment of President Clinton.
President Bush on the other hand lied while standing in the very chamber of the Republican controlled House of Representatives in his 03 state of the union. The nature of his lie was purely due to political motiviations. It has been a stated neocon belief since the mid 90's that the overthrow of Iraq would lead to a flowering of democracy and be a base for future U.S. military functions in the mideast. As is stated here "After the terrorist attacks on the US homeland, so single-minded were these ideologues that they were immediately "ready with a detailed, plausible blueprint for the nation's response. They were not troubled that their plan had been in preparation for over a decade for different reasons, in a different context, and in relation to different countries and, as such, did not in any way represent a direct response to the events themselves".
So we have a President who lied to get us into an unnecessary war that has cost America hundreds of billions of dollars, and thousands of lives. This war has also cost America all the international goodwill we incurred after the attacks on 09/11. This goodwill was and is indespensable in a successful war on terror. All for an ideaology that is flawed. What is the punishment for that? If there is no consequence for this monstrosity who is to say there is anything wrong with continuing said behavior? Look at my post here for the possible ramifications of allowing this to go unchallenged.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]